Re: Archives policy

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Archives policy
Date: 2009-04-16 19:08:53
Message-ID: 28084.1239908933@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> writes:
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 7:29 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
>> Altogether that page now reads like, our archiving system is too stupid to
>> handle removals and we are too busy to bother. Not sure if that will serve to
>> convince people. "Extremely difficult" is after all the same as "possible".

> Well that is essentially correct :-) Any suggestions for alternative text?

The really key point is the one about there being many copies of our
archives that we have no control over, so asking us to remove our
copy accomplishes nothing worth the complainant's trouble. The rest is
unlikely to deter anyone.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2009-04-16 19:16:56 Re: Archives policy
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2009-04-16 19:07:59 Re: Archives policy