Re: NoMovementScanDirection

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: NoMovementScanDirection
Date: 2004-11-08 04:15:15
Message-ID: 28025.1099887315@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> writes:
> Ah, okay. I'll remove gistscancache() then, as this seems to be dead
> code.

Certainly none of the other index types have a concept of caching the
previous tuple like that. I agree, zap it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Stark 2004-11-08 04:34:39 Re: Increasing the length of pg_stat_activity.current_query...
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2004-11-08 03:45:34 Re: Romanian translation