Re: NoMovementScanDirection

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: NoMovementScanDirection
Date: 2004-11-08 03:04:26
Message-ID: 1099883066.22609.46.camel@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 2004-11-08 at 13:56, Tom Lane wrote:
> However execMain.c uses NoMovementScanDirection to denote "do nothing",
> and so es_direction will never have this value at runtime.

Ah, okay. I'll remove gistscancache() then, as this seems to be dead
code.

> Not sure if it's worth factoring the enum type into two (or more?)
> types to distinguish these shades of meaning.

IMHO it would be worth doing.

-Neil

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2004-11-08 03:45:34 Re: Romanian translation
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-11-08 02:56:16 Re: NoMovementScanDirection