Re: ubsan

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ubsan
Date: 2022-03-23 19:58:09
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> I think we should backpatch both, based on the reasoning in
> 46ab07ffda9d6c8e63360ded2d4568aa160a7700 ?

Yeah, I suppose. Is anyone going to step up and run a buildfarm
member with ubsan enabled? (I'm already checking -fsanitize=alignment
on longfin, but it seems advisable to keep that separate from

regards, tom lane

In response to

  • Re: ubsan at 2022-03-23 19:22:41 from Andres Freund


  • Re: ubsan at 2022-03-23 20:12:34 from Andres Freund
  • Re: ubsan at 2022-03-24 06:23:23 from Noah Misch

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2022-03-23 19:59:01 Re: Removing more vacuumlazy.c special cases, relfrozenxid optimizations
Previous Message Tom Lane 2022-03-23 19:50:36 Re: Documenting when to retry on serialization failure