Re: ubsan

From: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ubsan
Date: 2022-03-24 06:23:23
Message-ID: 20220324062323.GA3240013@rfd.leadboat.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 03:58:09PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> > I think we should backpatch both, based on the reasoning in
> > 46ab07ffda9d6c8e63360ded2d4568aa160a7700 ?
>
> Yeah, I suppose. Is anyone going to step up and run a buildfarm
> member with ubsan enabled?

thorntail has been running with UBSan since 2019. I've removed flag
-fno-sanitize=nonnull-attribute, which your changes rendered superfluous.

In response to

  • Re: ubsan at 2022-03-23 19:58:09 from Tom Lane

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrey V. Lepikhov 2022-03-24 06:43:37 Re: Fast COPY FROM based on batch insert
Previous Message Peter Smith 2022-03-24 06:17:46 Re: PG DOCS - logical replication filtering