From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: New version numbering practices |
Date: | 2016-08-15 21:31:27 |
Message-ID: | 27647.1471296687@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I wrote:
> I've pushed this with minor additional twiddling. We can work on the
> "UI issues" you mentioned at leisure. One that I noted is that psql's
> version-mismatch-warning messages aren't two-part-version aware, and
> will print "10.0" where they should say "10". Probably that fix should
> get back-patched, so that older psql branches will do the right thing
> if possible.
Attached is a WIP patch for that. I've only fixed psql/command.c
so far, but I put the support logic into fe_utils since we're going
to need it in some other places too (pg_dump at least). Any objections
to this general approach?
regards, tom lane
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
client-version-number-printing-0.1.patch | text/x-diff | 7.3 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2016-08-15 21:38:24 | Re: PSA: Systemd will kill PostgreSQL |
Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2016-08-15 21:11:55 | Re: Let's get rid of the separate minor version numbers for shlibs |