| From: | Yury Zhuravlev <u(dot)zhuravlev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Proposal: Remove regress-python3-mangle.mk |
| Date: | 2016-04-20 20:03:07 |
| Message-ID: | 27590f2a-9e23-415b-a833-3d2938a7b1ba@postgrespro.ru |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Also, I would bet that those tools would not know anything
> about converting PL language names between 'plpythonu' and 'plpython2u'
> and 'plpython3u'; so even if we used one of them, we would still need a
> layer pretty similar to what we have.
I do not see this as a problem because we can build Postgres only with one
version of Python (2 or 3).
Or am I missing something?
>may be a bit of a kluge
For python developer it is really strange...
PS I see Postgres philosophy - do not touch what works well, even if it
looks terrible. :)
--
Yury Zhuravlev
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2016-04-20 20:44:58 | Should XLogInsert() be done only inside a critical section? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2016-04-20 18:28:15 | Re: max_parallel_degree > 0 for 9.6 beta |