Re: QNX mention in tuplesort.c

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: QNX mention in tuplesort.c
Date: 2006-01-05 02:13:42
Message-ID: 27432.1136427222@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> There is a mention of QNX in tuplesort.c. Can that code segment be
> removed now that QNX is removed?

I'd leave it there. We don't have any certainty that the behavior
being worked around exists only on QNX4, and it's not like it's
costing a lot.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kris Jurka 2006-01-05 02:30:51 Re: Heads up: upcoming back-branch re-releases
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-01-05 02:10:36 Re: Improving "missing FROM-clause entry" message