Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Or we could decide that volatile domain CHECK expressions are un-sensible
>> and just relabel all these input functions as stable, which would make
>> everything consistent. Thoughts?
> Aren't volatile CHECK expressions pretty un-sensible in general?
Yeah, probably so. I can't think of a use-case that seems like it would
justify the possible performance hit from having to assume all functions
performing datatype input calls are volatile.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Joshua D. Drake||Date: 2010-07-29 17:12:06|
|Subject: Re: On Scalability|
|Previous:||From: Vincenzo Romano||Date: 2010-07-29 17:08:52|
|Subject: On Scalability|