Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes: > On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote: >> Or we could decide that volatile domain CHECK expressions are un-sensible >> and just relabel all these input functions as stable, which would make >> everything consistent. Thoughts?
> Aren't volatile CHECK expressions pretty un-sensible in general?
Yeah, probably so. I can't think of a use-case that seems like it would justify the possible performance hit from having to assume all functions performing datatype input calls are volatile.