Re: Re: Too many open files (was Re: spinlock problems reported earlier)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: Too many open files (was Re: spinlock problems reported earlier)
Date: 2000-12-23 23:42:24
Message-ID: 27220.977614944@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Maybe a setting that controls the total number of files that postmaster
> plus backends can allocate among them would be useful.

That'd be nice if we could do it, but I don't see any inexpensive way
to get one backend to release an open FD when another one needs one.
So, divvying up the limit on an N-per-backend basis seems like the
most workable approach.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-12-23 23:42:53 Re: Re: Too many open files (was Re: spinlock problems reported earlier)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-12-23 23:12:53 Re: Re: Too many open files (was Re: spinlock problems reported earlier)