Re: limit to default display in psql

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: limit to default display in psql
Date: 2009-11-16 05:46:46
Message-ID: 2720.1258350406@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> writes:
> Is there some significance to the 128 other than simple formatting?

I think it's just an arbitrary restriction :-(

> Also, if anyone knows when pg_attrdef.adsrc became unreliable, that would save
> me some trouble. Thanks in advance.

It has never been reliable.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Davis 2009-11-16 05:59:27 Re: New VACUUM FULL
Previous Message Itagaki Takahiro 2009-11-16 05:46:09 Re: proposal: using PQexecParams in psql (using variables as real params)