Re: New VACUUM FULL

From: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
To: Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: New VACUUM FULL
Date: 2009-11-16 05:59:27
Message-ID: 1258351167.18130.106.camel@jdavis
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 13:37 +0900, Itagaki Takahiro wrote:
> Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > You left INPLACE in the patch
>
> Oops, removed.
>
> > Sounds fine, but worth a mention in the documentation. Just add to the
> > "columns" part of the VACUUM page something like: "If specified, implies
> > ANALYZE".
>
> Added.
>

Great, I am marking this part "ready for committer".

I may be slow to review the remainder of the VACUUM FULL rewrite patch
due to the conference in Tokyo, but I will review it soon afterward.

Regards,
Jeff Davis

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Gierth 2009-11-16 06:04:15 Re: ORDER BY vs. volatile functions
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-11-16 05:46:46 Re: limit to default display in psql