Re: [PATCHES] Forcing current WAL file to be archived

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Forcing current WAL file to be archived
Date: 2006-08-03 22:00:20
Message-ID: 26834.1154642420@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> Patch included to implement xlog switching, using an xlog record
> "processing instruction" and forcibly moving xlog pointers.

Just to be clear --- does this fully supersede your draft patch of
27-July, or is that still on the table too?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-08-03 22:15:32 Re: pg_terminate_backend
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2006-08-03 21:56:53 Re: [BUGS] Patch to allow C extension modules to initialize/finish

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-08-03 22:37:34 Re: LWLock statistics collector (was: CSStorm occurred again by postgreSQL8.2)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-08-03 21:14:36 Re: tg_trigtuple/tg_newtuple settings in AFTER triggers