Re: [PATCHES] Forcing current WAL file to be archived

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Forcing current WAL file to be archived
Date: 2006-08-04 11:12:36
Message-ID: 1154689956.2592.1021.camel@holly
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 18:00 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > Patch included to implement xlog switching, using an xlog record
> > "processing instruction" and forcibly moving xlog pointers.
>
> Just to be clear --- does this fully supersede your draft patch of
> 27-July, or is that still on the table too?

Sorry for lack of clarity.

This patch supersedes the draft patch of 27 July, which should have been
marked more clearly as WIP.

--
Simon Riggs
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2006-08-04 12:10:04 Re: 8.2 features status
Previous Message Katsuhiko Okano 2006-08-04 11:05:43 Re: LWLock statistics collector (was: CSStorm occurred again by postgreSQL8.2)

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-08-04 15:53:52 Re: LWLock statistics collector
Previous Message Katsuhiko Okano 2006-08-04 11:05:43 Re: LWLock statistics collector (was: CSStorm occurred again by postgreSQL8.2)