Re: Boolean operators without commutators vs. ALL/ANY

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Boolean operators without commutators vs. ALL/ANY
Date: 2011-06-16 21:33:17
Message-ID: 26802.1308259997@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> I don't really agree that visual correlation needs to trump everything.
> If say
> foo =~ bar
> and
> foo ~= bar
> were to produce completely different results, this would introduce bugs
> all over the place.

Huh? That's about like arguing that standard mathematical notation is
broken because a < b and a > b don't produce the same result.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-06-16 21:38:07 Re: Another swing at JSON
Previous Message Bernd Helmle 2011-06-16 21:29:27 Re: Another swing at JSON