Re: Dubious usage of TYPCATEGORY_STRING

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Dubious usage of TYPCATEGORY_STRING
Date: 2021-12-11 19:12:06
Message-ID: 266734.1639249926@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> On 07.12.21 21:24, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Um, I definitely gave up too easily there. The one usage in \dp
>> seems to be the*only* thing that breaks in describe.c, and pg_dump
>> doesn't need any changes so far as check-world reveals. So let's
>> just move "char" to another category, as attached.

> Looks good to me.

Pushed, thanks for reviewing.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2021-12-11 19:16:24 Re: Add spin_delay() implementation for Arm in s_lock.h
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2021-12-11 17:52:29 Re: Unifying VACUUM VERBOSE and log_autovacuum_min_duration output