| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> | 
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> | 
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> | 
| Subject: | Re: factor out encoding dependent json/jsonb regression tests | 
| Date: | 2015-10-05 17:53:33 | 
| Message-ID: | 26387.1444067613@sss.pgh.pa.us | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers | 
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> I'm rather tired of having to update two sets of output files every time 
> we change the json and jsonb regression tests. Also, other committers 
> occasionally fall over this trap and fail to update json_1.out and 
> jsonb_1.out, as do almost all other patch authors. I propose that we 
> remove those tests to quite small json_utf8.sql and jsonb_utf8.sql 
> (which will each have 2 output files) and that will allow us to get rid 
> of json_1.out and jsonb_1.out. I'd like to backpatch this to 9.4 for 
> jsonb and 9.2 for json. Alternatively, for >= 9.4 we could just add the 
> jsonb encoding-specific tests to json_utf8.sql, to avoid a greater 
> proliferation of tests.
I'd vote for your alternative plan (ie, just one new regression .sql
file).  It will be so small that having two even-smaller ones seems silly.
Is "json_utf8" really the best name, or should it be "json_encoding"?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2015-10-05 18:01:49 | Re: factor out encoding dependent json/jsonb regression tests | 
| Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2015-10-05 17:52:20 | Re: factor out encoding dependent json/jsonb regression tests |