Re: 8.3devel slower than 8.2 under read-only load

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: "Guillaume Smet" <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Greg Smith" <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 8.3devel slower than 8.2 under read-only load
Date: 2007-11-26 02:33:16
Message-ID: 26304.1196044396@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> But since your columns are varchar, which doesn't have any operators of its
>> own, we have to go through oper_select_candidate()

> I wonder whether at some point we shouldn't just eliminate this distinction
> entirely. Just make "text" and "varchar" the same type and spell it "text"
> when there's no typmod length restriction and "varchar(x)" when there is.

I've thought about that more than once, but I'm worried that it would
eliminate one of the few heavily-used cases we have for
binary-compatible operations, thereby making it even harder to find
performance issues for those situations. In any case, it wouldn't do
anything to fix the basic problem that ambiguous-operator resolution is
expensive when there are lots of similarly-named operators. We've
chipped away at that with various hacks over the years, but I don't
think it's ever occurred to us (or at least to me) before to try
short-circuiting the entire process through a lookaside cache.
We'd probably need to flush the cache on changes in pg_operator
or pg_cast, but neither of those change often ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gregory Stark 2007-11-26 03:15:18 Re: quote_literal(integer) does not exist
Previous Message Gregory Stark 2007-11-26 02:14:57 Re: 8.3devel slower than 8.2 under read-only load