| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su> |
| Cc: | Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, "'pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "'Pgsql Hackers'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] postgresql under Windows is slow |
| Date: | 2002-01-31 15:16:42 |
| Message-ID: | 2624.1012490202@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-hackers |
Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su> writes:
> What I can do to get more preformance ?
Sounds like the answer is "stop using Windows 98".
Now that Dave mentions it, I do recall that it was Great Bridge's
people who had gotten pretty much the same numbers from their TPC-C
benchmark on Cygwin as on Linux. I'm quite sure they'd have been
using a current-at-the-time Windows ... so, either NT or W2K.
Probably NT but I can't say that for certain.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Radu-Adrian Popescu | 2002-01-31 15:36:38 | Regression tests failed on 7.2rc2 |
| Previous Message | Henshall, Stuart - WCP | 2002-01-31 13:43:12 | Re: postgresql under Windows is slow |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-01-31 15:45:38 | Re: Per-database and per-user GUC settings |
| Previous Message | Oleg Bartunov | 2002-01-31 11:50:58 | Re: [HACKERS] postgresql under Windows is slow |