From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improved parallel make support |
Date: | 2010-11-13 16:12:50 |
Message-ID: | 26197.1289664770@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> I'm curious to know how much all this buys us.
It *would* be nice if "make -k" worked better. I frequently run into
the fact that (with the pre-existing setup) a compile error in the
backend prevented make from proceeding with builds of interfaces/,
bin/, etc, meaning that that work still remains to be done after I've
finished fixing the backend error.
But having said that, I won't shed many tears if we have to revert this.
It looks like all the unhappy critters are getting the same "virtual
memory exhausted" error. I wonder whether they are all using make 3.80
...
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-11-13 16:23:55 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improved parallel make support |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2010-11-13 16:06:52 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improved parallel make support |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-11-13 16:23:55 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improved parallel make support |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2010-11-13 16:06:52 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improved parallel make support |