Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improved parallel make support

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improved parallel make support
Date: 2010-11-13 16:12:50
Message-ID: 26197.1289664770@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> I'm curious to know how much all this buys us.

It *would* be nice if "make -k" worked better. I frequently run into
the fact that (with the pre-existing setup) a compile error in the
backend prevented make from proceeding with builds of interfaces/,
bin/, etc, meaning that that work still remains to be done after I've
finished fixing the backend error.

But having said that, I won't shed many tears if we have to revert this.

It looks like all the unhappy critters are getting the same "virtual
memory exhausted" error. I wonder whether they are all using make 3.80
...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-11-13 16:23:55 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improved parallel make support
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2010-11-13 16:06:52 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improved parallel make support

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-11-13 16:23:55 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improved parallel make support
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2010-11-13 16:06:52 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improved parallel make support