Re: language handlers in public schema?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: language handlers in public schema?
Date: 2005-06-26 19:55:18
Message-ID: 2619.1119815718@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Yeah. I think we'd need to add "where langlcallfoid != 0" so we don't
> pick up the internal/C/sql handlers. However, on closer inspection it
> appears that doind all this in pg_dump would be lots more invasive than
> I first thought.

Why --- what else is needed beyond the addition of those clauses to the
one query?

> me either, but I wonder if we should provide an option on pg_dump to
> restore function handlers found in public to whatever we decide about
> the above.

I don't see the need. If they were in public before, they can stay
there --- or the DBA can run createlang before running pg_restore to
put them where he wants.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2005-06-26 20:10:19 Re: Implementing SQL/PSM for PG 8.2
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-06-26 19:52:29 Re: tsearch2 changes need backpatching?

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2005-06-26 20:31:51 Re: language handlers in public schema?
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2005-06-26 19:52:26 Re: pl/pgsql: END verbosity