David Garamond <lists(at)zara(dot)6(dot)isreserved(dot)com> writes:
>> ... I for one don't wish to reopen the topic.
> Yeah, and this is why I suggested adding a bit on this in the FAQ or
> license page. The reason is, FSF lists in their license list[1] page,
> "original BSD" and "modified BSD". PG license is stated as "BSD" and
> which BSD that is might not be clear for some people, they might think
> it's the original BSD.
This is FSF's fault then. I will write to RMS and ask him to fix the
ambiguity.
regards, tom lane