Re: Physical Database Configuration

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>
Cc: Guy Rouillier <guyr(at)masergy(dot)com>, PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Physical Database Configuration
Date: 2004-03-27 06:03:56
Message-ID: 2531.1080367436@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to> writes:
> As for one opinion on why reply-to headers shouldn't be munged, see:
> http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html

Also note that the PG lists do *not* insert any reply-to headers
(I quite agree with the above link's reasons why the list bot should
not do so). Any reply-to you see in a list message was put there
by the message author.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-03-27 06:11:14 Re: License on PostgreSQL
Previous Message David Garamond 2004-03-27 05:59:44 Re: License on PostgreSQL