Re: [Fwd: Re: [ANNOUNCE] spreading the word on new PostgreSQL software appliance]

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Liraz Siri <liraz(at)turnkeylinux(dot)org>, jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, Chander Ganesan <chander(at)otg-nc(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: [ANNOUNCE] spreading the word on new PostgreSQL software appliance]
Date: 2008-12-10 03:34:56
Message-ID: 25939.1228880096@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> So, can you forward us the name & e-mail of a designated technical
> contact at TurnKey?

Liraz stated that they don't package PG themselves, just redistribute
the Ubuntu package quasi-automatically. So they have no need to be on
pgsql-packagers.

I'm a bit bemused by what our standards for linking ought to be in a
case like this. I still don't like the notion of "we'll link to anyone
who asks", but I can't quite see what higher standard should be imposed
for a redistribution.

(BTW, do we have Ubuntu's packager on pgsql-packagers? I've forgotten.)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Guido Barosio 2008-12-10 04:03:02 Re: Pootle server request
Previous Message Robert Treat 2008-12-10 03:13:06 Re: [Fwd: Re: [ANNOUNCE] spreading the word on new PostgreSQL software appliance]