Re: Cleaning up historical portability baggage

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Cleaning up historical portability baggage
Date: 2022-07-10 14:36:08
Message-ID: 259067.1657463768@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I wrote:
> Having said that, I'll be happy to try out this patch series on
> that platform and see if it burps.

HEAD + patches 0001-0006 seems fine on prairiedog's host.
Builds clean (or as clean as HEAD does anyway), passes make check.
I did not trouble with check-world.

(I haven't actually read the patches, so this isn't a review,
just a quick smoke-test.)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Stark 2022-07-10 15:25:40 Re: Cleaning up historical portability baggage
Previous Message Tom Lane 2022-07-10 14:27:01 Re: Compilation issue on Solaris.