| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Apple's ranlib warns about protocol_openssl.c |
| Date: | 2021-12-31 01:03:54 |
| Message-ID: | 2559611.1640912634@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> I also see it on an m1 mini I got when building against openssl 3.
Huh, I wonder why I'm not seeing it.
> There is -no_warning_for_no_symbols in apple's ranlib. But perhaps
> there's another way around this:
> We have ssl_protocol_version_to_openssl() in both be-secure-openssl.c
> and fe-secure-openssl.c. Perhaps we should just move it to
> protocol_openssl.c?
Those functions have the same name, but not the same arguments,
so it'd take some refactoring to share any code.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | tanghy.fnst@fujitsu.com | 2021-12-31 01:12:25 | RE: Failed transaction statistics to measure the logical replication progress |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2021-12-31 00:49:35 | Re: Apple's ranlib warns about protocol_openssl.c |