Re: BUG #15448: server process (PID 22656) was terminated by exception 0xC0000005

From: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: tillmann73(at)yahoo(dot)de, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, PG Bug reporting form <noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org>, andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com
Subject: Re: BUG #15448: server process (PID 22656) was terminated by exception 0xC0000005
Date: 2018-10-23 03:27:41
Message-ID: 253f2143-2477-c3f6-5fb6-613d4847aeed@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

On 2018/10/23 12:16, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 11:00:56AM +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
>> FWIW, attached patch fixes this for me. Adding Andrew whose recent commit
>> 7636e5c60f [1] seems to have introduced the heap_expan_tuple call in
>> GetTupleForTrigger. Maybe, he can better judge a fix for this.
>
> Could you add that to the next commit fest as a bug fix? Adding
> yourself as an author of this patch would be adapted. And we don't want
> to lose track of this issue. (I am looking at some other stuff now...)

Okay, I'll add this one and one more I posted a patch for last week.

Thanks,
Amit

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2018-10-23 03:36:14 Re: BUG #15437: Segfault during insert into declarative partitioned table with a trigger creating partition
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2018-10-23 03:20:21 Re: BUG #15452: 10.5 and reproducible "ERROR: could not read block 0 in file..." when creating functional index

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro HORIGUCHI 2018-10-23 03:54:08 Re: [HACKERS] Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers, take 2
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2018-10-23 03:16:06 Re: BUG #15448: server process (PID 22656) was terminated by exception 0xC0000005