Re: BUG #15448: server process (PID 22656) was terminated by exception 0xC0000005

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: tillmann73(at)yahoo(dot)de, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, PG Bug reporting form <noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org>, andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com
Subject: Re: BUG #15448: server process (PID 22656) was terminated by exception 0xC0000005
Date: 2018-10-23 03:16:06
Message-ID: 20181023031606.GB1658@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 11:00:56AM +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
> FWIW, attached patch fixes this for me. Adding Andrew whose recent commit
> 7636e5c60f [1] seems to have introduced the heap_expan_tuple call in
> GetTupleForTrigger. Maybe, he can better judge a fix for this.

Could you add that to the next commit fest as a bug fix? Adding
yourself as an author of this patch would be adapted. And we don't want
to lose track of this issue. (I am looking at some other stuff now...)
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2018-10-23 03:27:41 Re: BUG #15448: server process (PID 22656) was terminated by exception 0xC0000005
Previous Message Ioseph Kim 2018-10-23 02:41:08 Re: [HACKERS] Fix number skipping in to_number

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2018-10-23 03:20:21 Re: BUG #15452: 10.5 and reproducible "ERROR: could not read block 0 in file..." when creating functional index
Previous Message Amit Langote 2018-10-23 02:00:56 Re: BUG #15448: server process (PID 22656) was terminated by exception 0xC0000005