Re: psql with "Function Type" in \df

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: tomas(at)tuxteam(dot)de, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: psql with "Function Type" in \df
Date: 2009-04-22 14:40:52
Message-ID: 2535.1240411252@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> If I can get someone else to say they prefer brackets over parentheses in
> \? I will make the change. Right now we have:

> \df[antwS+] [PATTERN] list (only agg/normal/trigger/window) functions

> With brackets it would be:

> \df[antwS+] [PATTERN] list [only agg/normal/trigger/window] functions

Yes, the brackets in the text match up with the brackets in the syntax,
so I think this looks more sensible.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2009-04-22 14:44:15 Re: psql with "Function Type" in \df
Previous Message Robert Campbell 2009-04-22 14:36:56 Re: Workaround for bug #4608?