Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: psql with "Function Type" in \df

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: tomas(at)tuxteam(dot)de
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: psql with "Function Type" in \df
Date: 2009-04-22 13:34:53
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
tomas(at)tuxteam(dot)de wrote:
> Hash: SHA1
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 08:32:20AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> [...]
> > True, but the problem is that the brackets don't correspond [...]
> Yes, right. Still, square brackets seem (to me) to provide some visual
> cue. But I admit that this is already advanced bikeshedding and thus
> I'll politely bow out :-)

No problem;  we like polish here.  ;-)

If I can get someone else to say they prefer brackets over parentheses in
\? I will make the change.  Right now we have:

   \df[antwS+] [PATTERN]  list (only agg/normal/trigger/window) functions

With brackets it would be:

   \df[antwS+] [PATTERN]  list [only agg/normal/trigger/window] functions

  Bruce Momjian  <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Obe, ReginaDate: 2009-04-22 13:36:56
Subject: Re: Workaround for bug #4608?
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2009-04-22 13:28:46
Subject: Re: [NOVICE] Workaround for bug #4608?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group