From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | tomas(at)tuxteam(dot)de |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Subject: | Re: psql with "Function Type" in \df |
Date: | 2009-04-22 13:34:53 |
Message-ID: | 200904221334.n3MDYrf20635@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
tomas(at)tuxteam(dot)de wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 08:32:20AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > True, but the problem is that the brackets don't correspond [...]
>
> Yes, right. Still, square brackets seem (to me) to provide some visual
> cue. But I admit that this is already advanced bikeshedding and thus
> I'll politely bow out :-)
No problem; we like polish here. ;-)
If I can get someone else to say they prefer brackets over parentheses in
\? I will make the change. Right now we have:
\df[antwS+] [PATTERN] list (only agg/normal/trigger/window) functions
With brackets it would be:
\df[antwS+] [PATTERN] list [only agg/normal/trigger/window] functions
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Obe, Regina | 2009-04-22 13:36:56 | Re: Workaround for bug #4608? |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2009-04-22 13:28:46 | Re: [NOVICE] Workaround for bug #4608? |