Re: improved DefElem list processing

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: improved DefElem list processing
Date: 2016-09-06 23:23:22
Message-ID: 25325.1473204202@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> Here are two WIP patches to improve the DefElem list processing that is
> used by many utility commands.

> One factors out the duplicate checks, which are currently taking up a
> lot of space with duplicate code. I haven't applied this everywhere
> yet, but the patch shows how much boring code can be saved.

I'm curious where you are on that? I find myself needing to whack around
this processing in CREATE EXTENSION, but I don't want to create a merge
problem for you if you're close to committing.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2016-09-06 23:28:47 Re: Parallel tuplesort (for parallel B-Tree index creation)
Previous Message Craig Ringer 2016-09-06 22:53:18 Re: Let file_fdw access COPY FROM PROGRAM