| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: remove bits* types |
| Date: | 2026-03-30 17:07:32 |
| Message-ID: | 2493698.1774890452@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> With Melanie's note, there are at least 4 votes in favor of this patch
> (Andres, me, Peter, and Melanie). AFAICT Michael is +/-0, Álvaro and Tom
> are -1 (or somewhere in the vicinity), and Robert seems ambivalent. Hm...
To clarify, what I said was we should either remove them or use them
more consistently. I don't think 1bd6f22f4 moved the needle very
far towards option 2, so I'm totally fine with option 1. Put me
down as +0.5.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Nathan Bossart | 2026-03-30 17:12:13 | Re: remove bits* types |
| Previous Message | Nathan Bossart | 2026-03-30 17:00:01 | Re: remove bits* types |