Re: making pg_regress less noisy by removing boilerplate

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Subject: Re: making pg_regress less noisy by removing boilerplate
Date: 2022-02-22 13:55:23
Message-ID: 2464dcb5-9b63-8021-d58c-6756445f4e08@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 2/21/22 12:31, Andres Freund wrote:
>
> We still have a few issues with ports conflicts on windows. We should really
> consider just desupporting all windows versions without unix socket
> support. But until then it seems useful to be able to figure out random
> failures.
>

I'm pretty sure all my Windows machines with buildfarm animals are
sufficiently modern except the XP machine, which only builds release 10
nowadays.

What's involved in moving to require Unix socket support?

cheers

andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Shmuel Kamensky 2022-02-22 14:02:39 C++ Trigger Framework
Previous Message Aleksander Alekseev 2022-02-22 13:31:04 Re: External data files possible?