Re: IndexTupleDSize macro seems redundant

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ildar Musin <i(dot)musin(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: IndexTupleDSize macro seems redundant
Date: 2018-01-11 23:19:08
Message-ID: 24410.1515712748@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
> Updated (combined) patch attached for review. I went through and looked
> again to make sure there weren't any cases of making an unaligned
> pointer to a struct and didn't see any, and I added some comments to
> _bt_restore_page().

Looks OK from here.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Stark 2018-01-11 23:23:11 Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions
Previous Message Haribabu Kommi 2018-01-11 23:15:30 Re: [HACKERS] Planning counters in pg_stat_statements