Re: longjmp in psql considered harmful

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: longjmp in psql considered harmful
Date: 2006-06-11 19:23:50
Message-ID: 24353.1150053830@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> writes:
> If you're asking me, yes. I use it a lot and would miss it if it were
> gone. Is there another shortcut for "abort current command and don't
> store in history but don't clear it from the screen"?

Why are you expecting editing niceties (or history for that matter) when
you're not using readline? This code isn't used if readline is enabled.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2006-06-11 19:29:40 Re: How to avoid transaction ID wrap
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2006-06-11 19:21:43 Re: longjmp in psql considered harmful