| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: SSPI vs MingW |
| Date: | 2007-07-23 14:34:18 |
| Message-ID: | 24327.1185201258@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> 1) Simply state that SSPI authentication in the backend cannot be built
>> with mingw, and require msvc build for it (the msvc api follows the windows
>> api, which is hardly surprising). We could add an autoconf test for it
>> that'd pick up an updated libsecur32.a file if/when mingw release an
>> update.
> I prefer this option,
+1. I grow weary of working around so many Windows-related bugs/omissions.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2007-07-23 14:36:00 | Re: Oops in fe-auth.c |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-07-23 14:28:57 | Re: Oops in fe-auth.c |