| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: s/pg_attribute_always_inline/pg_always_inline/? |
| Date: | 2026-07-09 00:14:49 |
| Message-ID: | 2391698.1783556089@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Thu, 9 Jul 2026 at 09:42, Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me> wrote:
>> I guess we should just commit that, so unless someone objects soon I'll
>> just do that. ISTM the agreement is to backpatch this too.
> How about just backpatching the new macro and leaving the old one in
> place back branches?
+1. Breaking valid code in released branches is unfriendly.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Richard Guo | 2026-07-09 01:01:35 | Re: Add enable_groupagg GUC parameter to control GroupAggregate usage |
| Previous Message | Peter Smith | 2026-07-09 00:02:29 | Re: Per-table resync for logical replication subscriptions |