| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ted Powell <ted(at)theplace(dot)enposte(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Logging statements and parameter values |
| Date: | 2006-01-27 15:26:14 |
| Message-ID: | 2383.1138375574@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Ted Powell <ted(at)theplace(dot)enposte(dot)net> writes:
> Has this not been done simply because nobody has gotten around to it, or
> are there pitfalls?
What are you going to do with binary parameter values? Calling the
type's output converter is possible but not very pleasant.
> Also, the Datum params[i].value, does it necessarily hold displayable
> text, even when its content is the output of a binary input converter?
Datums are guaranteed *not* to be displayable text.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-01-27 15:32:34 | Re: PG_RESTORE and database size |
| Previous Message | Ilja Golshtein | 2006-01-27 15:22:00 | Re: table is not a table |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Hallgren | 2006-01-27 15:29:32 | Re: Adding a --quiet option to initdb |
| Previous Message | Jason Essington | 2006-01-27 15:21:23 | Re: Segfault Exiting psql |