Re: Let's stop with the retail rebuilds of src/port/ files already

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Let's stop with the retail rebuilds of src/port/ files already
Date: 2018-09-27 14:17:33
Message-ID: 2363.1538057853@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> writes:
>> On September 26, 2018 9:03:05 PM PDT, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> # libpgport is needed by some contrib
>>> +# currently we don't install libpgport_shlib.a, maybe we should?

> Likely you should as this could be used directly by out-of-core things.

Maybe, but what things exactly? Extension modules don't need it, as
they just call the versions built into the core backend.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2018-09-27 14:24:07 Re: Postgres 11 release notes
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2018-09-27 14:08:31 Re: Problem while setting the fpw with SIGHUP