Re: Turning recovery.conf into GUCs

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alex Shulgin <ash(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Turning recovery.conf into GUCs
Date: 2014-11-24 15:32:47
Message-ID: 23161.1416843167@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alex Shulgin <ash(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Maybe we should move these check/assign hooks to xlog.c, but that's
> likely going to create header files dependency problem due to use of
> GucSource in the hook prototype...

As far as that goes, there is already plenty of precedent for declaring
assorted check/assign hook functions in guc.h rather than including guc.h
into the headers where they would otherwise belong.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2014-11-24 15:46:23 Re: no test programs in contrib
Previous Message Andres Freund 2014-11-24 15:31:47 Re: Turning recovery.conf into GUCs