Re: velog + vereport?

Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On Friday, October 12, 2012 02:48:42 PM Tom Lane wrote:
>> Um ... and that accomplishes what? You wouldn't have velog/vereport
>> outside the backend either. If you were going to clone those in some
>> form in the external environment, you might as well clone the existing
>> elog infrastructure functions.

> The advantage is that if you something velog-ish you can have a function which
> accepts vararg arguments and forwards them.
> E.g.
> xlogreader->error(ERROR, "...", argument, argument);

Meh. I can't get excited about that, but in any case, that looks like
it would only justify a varargs version of errmsg(), not the entire
ereport infrastructure.

regards, tom lane