Re: velog + vereport?

On Friday, October 12, 2012 04:59:39 PM Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > On Friday, October 12, 2012 02:48:42 PM Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Um ... and that accomplishes what? You wouldn't have velog/vereport
> >> outside the backend either. If you were going to clone those in some
> >> form in the external environment, you might as well clone the existing
> >> elog infrastructure functions.
> >
> > The advantage is that if you something velog-ish you can have a function
> > which accepts vararg arguments and forwards them.
> > E.g.
> > xlogreader->error(ERROR, "...", argument, argument);
>
> Meh. I can't get excited about that, but in any case, that looks like
> it would only justify a varargs version of errmsg(), not the entire
> ereport infrastructure.
Yes, that sounds good enough. Are you vetoing that idea (in that case I won't
pursue it) or just aren't excited about it?

Andres

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services