From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Speed up Clog Access by increasing CLOG buffers |
Date: | 2017-03-10 06:21:28 |
Message-ID: | 22895.1489126888@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Just to let you know that I think I have figured out the reason of
> failure. If we run the regressions with attached patch, it will make
> the regression tests fail consistently in same way. The patch just
> makes all transaction status updates to go via group clog update
> mechanism.
This does *not* give me a warm fuzzy feeling that this patch was
ready to commit. Or even that it was tested to the claimed degree.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jim Nasby | 2017-03-10 06:58:56 | Re: Report the number of skipped frozen pages by manual VACUUM |
Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2017-03-10 06:13:40 | Re: Speed up Clog Access by increasing CLOG buffers |