Re: REINDEX INDEX results in a crash for an index of pg_class since 9.6

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Subject: Re: REINDEX INDEX results in a crash for an index of pg_class since 9.6
Date: 2019-05-07 16:07:37
Message-ID: 2283.1557245257@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> Yea, that might be right. I'm planning to leave the tests in until a
> bunch of the open REINDEX issues are resolved. Not super likely that
> it'd break something, but probably worth anyway?

The number of deadlock failures is kind of annoying, so I'd rather remove
the tests from HEAD sooner than later. What issues around that do you
think remain that these tests would be helpful for?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2019-05-07 16:09:13 Re: REINDEX INDEX results in a crash for an index of pg_class since 9.6
Previous Message Andres Freund 2019-05-07 16:06:56 Re: Unhappy about API changes in the no-fsm-for-small-rels patch