| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Subject: | Re: REINDEX INDEX results in a crash for an index of pg_class since 9.6 |
| Date: | 2019-05-07 16:09:13 |
| Message-ID: | 20190507160913.57s2ensw4h4g2wxk@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2019-05-07 12:07:37 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> > Yea, that might be right. I'm planning to leave the tests in until a
> > bunch of the open REINDEX issues are resolved. Not super likely that
> > it'd break something, but probably worth anyway?
>
> The number of deadlock failures is kind of annoying, so I'd rather remove
> the tests from HEAD sooner than later. What issues around that do you
> think remain that these tests would be helpful for?
I was wondering about
https://postgr.es/m/20190430151735.wi52sxjvxsjvaxxt%40alap3.anarazel.de
but perhaps it's too unlikely to break anything the tests would detect
though.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2019-05-07 16:12:37 | Re: Unhappy about API changes in the no-fsm-for-small-rels patch |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2019-05-07 16:07:37 | Re: REINDEX INDEX results in a crash for an index of pg_class since 9.6 |