Re: snapper vs. HEAD

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Tom Turelinckx" <pgbf(at)twiska(dot)com>
Cc: "Andres Freund" <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: snapper vs. HEAD
Date: 2020-03-30 17:51:09
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Tom Turelinckx" <pgbf(at)twiska(dot)com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Thanks! But it doesn't seem to have taken: snapper just did a new run
>> that still failed, and it still seems to be using -O2.

> Snapper did build using -O1 a few hours ago, but it failed the check stage very early with a different error:
> FATAL: null value in column "classid" of relation "pg_depend" violates not-null constraint

Ugh. Compiler bugs coming out of the woodwork?

Not sure what to suggest here. It certainly is useful to us to have
sparc buildfarm testing, but probably sparc64 would be more useful
than sparc32. (It looks like FreeBSD and OpenBSD have dropped sparc32
altogether, and NetBSD has bumped it to tier II status.) One idea
is to try -O0 ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2020-03-30 18:00:42 Re: fix for BUG #3720: wrong results at using ltree
Previous Message Tom Lane 2020-03-30 17:40:31 Re: snapper vs. HEAD