Re: Preprocessor condition fix

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Christian Ullrich <chris(at)chrullrich(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Preprocessor condition fix
Date: 2016-04-12 13:49:11
Message-ID: 22715.1460468951@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Christian Ullrich <chris(at)chrullrich(dot)net> writes:
> * Tom Lane wrote:
>> Hm, my grep found another one ...

> Oh, sorry. I saw that one, but thought it was intentional because _WIN64
> is defined automatically anyway.

Oh? Then we should not need that one (the /D switch in win32.mak) at all.
Should we just remove it?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christian Ullrich 2016-04-12 13:52:10 Re: Preprocessor condition fix
Previous Message Craig Ringer 2016-04-12 13:36:24 Re: Some other things about contrib/bloom and generic_xlog.c