| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Victor Wagner <vitus(at)wagner(dot)pp(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: OpenSSL 1.1 breaks configure and more |
| Date: | 2016-09-05 00:23:43 |
| Message-ID: | 22693.1473035023@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se> writes:
> On 08/30/2016 08:42 AM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>> PS. I just remembered that I've wanted to refactor the pgcrypto calls
>> for symmetric encryption to use the newer EVP API for some time, and
>> even posted a patch for that
>> (https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/561274F1.1030000@iki.fi). I
>> dropped the ball back then, but I think I'll go ahead and do that now,
>> once we get these other OpenSSL changes in.
> Nice!
Judging by the number of people who have popped up recently with their
own OpenSSL 1.1 patches, I think there is going to be a lot of demand for
back-patching some sort of 1.1 support into our back branches. All this
talk of refactoring does not sound very back-patchable. Should we be
thinking of what we can extract that is back-patchable?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2016-09-05 00:26:12 | Re: Parallel build with MSVC |
| Previous Message | Noah Misch | 2016-09-05 00:18:36 | Re: Parallel build with MSVC |