Re: logical replication - still unstable after all these months

From: Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>
To: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Mark Kirkwood <mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: logical replication - still unstable after all these months
Date: 2017-05-29 04:44:20
Message-ID: 224ef94826dae892678c82cc2fb7f8af@xs4all.nl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2017-05-29 03:33, Jeff Janes wrote:
> On Sun, May 28, 2017 at 3:17 PM, Mark Kirkwood <
> mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz> wrote:
>
> I also got a failure, after 87 iterations of a similar test case. It
[...]
> repeated the runs, but so far it hasn't failed again in over 800
> iterations

Could you give the params for the successful runs?
(ideally, a grep | sort | uniq -c of the ran pgbench lines )

Can you say anything about hardware?

Thanks for repeating my lengthy tests.

Erik Rijkers

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Kirkwood 2017-05-29 05:06:37 Re: logical replication - still unstable after all these months
Previous Message Erik Rijkers 2017-05-29 04:26:36 Re: logical replication - still unstable after all these months